Alternatives, with sources

Compare theAuth with Auth0, Clerk, Better Auth and more

Looking for an open source or self-hosted alternative for AI agents? Each page below says what the other tool does well, where theAuth differs, and links to the sources we checked.

Last verified: 2026-10-07

When to pick what

Three honest options. Only the last one is theAuth.

A hosted vendor
Auth0, Clerk or Firebase Authentication fit when you want someone else to run login, polished UI and support, and your data can live with the vendor. You trade control and a usage-based bill for speed.
An open source library or server
Better Auth, Supabase Auth or Keycloak fit when you want to run it yourself. Better Auth suits TypeScript apps, Supabase Auth suits teams on Supabase Postgres, and Keycloak suits a central identity provider with LDAP.
theAuth
It fits when AI agents are part of the system and you want each one to have an owner, scoped permissions, delegation limits, budgets and an audit trail, in the same MIT library as human sign-in, with an MCP OAuth 2.1 authorization server.
theAuth runs as a library inside your own app, mounted through a framework adapter, with your own database behind it (Postgres, MySQL, SQLite or Cloudflare D1). You run the whole stack in your infrastructure, and identities stay in your database.

Overview across six tools

Only rows we could verify from each tool's public docs. Open a comparison for the detail and sources.

Overview of Auth0, Clerk, Better Auth, Supabase Auth, Firebase Auth, Keycloak and theAuth
FeatureAuth0ClerkBetter AuthSupabaseFirebaseKeycloaktheAuth
Delivery modelHosted platformHosted platformOpen source libraryBackend platformManaged serviceIdentity serverLibrary you run; Cloud in early access
Source licenseNo, ProprietaryNo, ProprietaryYes, MITYes, MITManaged serviceYes, Apache 2.0Yes, MIT
Self-hostablePartial or different, Managed private cloud onlyNo, NoYes, YesYes, YesNo, NoYes, YesYes, Yes
OAuth 2.1 server for MCPYes, YesYes, YesYes, YesYes, YesPartial or different, Not documentedYes, YesYes, Yes
Agent identity as its own modelPartial or different, Add-on: Token Vault, CIBAPartial or different, Not foundPartial or different, Plugin, not yet stablePartial or different, Agents act as usersPartial or different, Not documentedPartial or different, Not foundYes, Yes, core
Enterprise SSOYes, YesYes, YesYes, PluginYes, SAML 2.0Partial or different, Identity Platform upgradeYes, YesYes, SAML 2.0, OIDC, SCIM

Check mark: yes. Dash: partial, different, or not found in the docs we checked. Cross: no. Last verified: 2026-10-07.

Choosing an auth tool: common questions

Which auth tool is the best alternative for AI agents?

It depends on where you want to run it. Several tools now offer an OAuth 2.1 authorization server for MCP, so the difference is how agents are modeled. theAuth gives each agent its own identity with an owner, delegation limits, budgets and an audit trail, in an MIT library you run yourself.

Is theAuth better than Auth0 or Clerk?

Not for every team. Auth0 and Clerk are hosted products with polished login experiences, and that is the right choice if you want a vendor to run auth. theAuth fits when you want to self-host, own your data, and model agents as identities.

Should I use a library or a hosted vendor for auth?

Use a hosted vendor when speed and not operating anything matter most. Use a library when you need your data in your own database, want the code in your repository, or have requirements a vendor does not cover.

Get started

Give your first agent an identity.

Install the package, create an agent with scoped permissions, and read its first audit record. The core runs on Postgres, SQLite, MySQL or D1, and the Go module needs a single go get.

  • npm install @glinr/theauth
  • go get github.com/glincker/theauth-go
Or skip hosting with theAuth Cloud